English
العربية
বাংলা
Català
Čeština
Deutsch
Ελληνικά
Español
Suomi
Français
Gàidhlig
हिंदी
Magyar
Italiano
Қазақ
Latviešu
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Português do Brasil
Srpski (lat)
Српски
Svenska
Türkçe
Yкраї́нська
Tiếng Việt

New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?

Communities & Collections

Home
Council's Research Work

Council's Research Work

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://aoh.ccrhlibrary.in/handle/123456789/37

Browse

Search Subcommunities and Collections By Issue Date By Author By Title By Subject By Subject Category

9 results

Filters

search.filters.author.Khurana, Anil

4 search.filters.subject.COVID?19

1 search.filters.subject.Case report

1 search.filters.subject.Epidemics

1 search.filters.subject.Evidence base

1 search.filters.subject.Integrative Medicine

Search subject

Browse subject tree

Start

End

Settings

Sort By

Results per page

Author: search.filters.author.Khurana, Anil×

Start date: 2020×

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 9 of 9

Second wave of COVID?19: Steps and future vision
(2021) Khurana, Anil
Homoeopathy in epidemics: Bridging the gap
(2020) Khurana, Anil
Homoeopathy in COVID-19: Building evidence
(2021) Khurana, Anil
COVID-19: What lies ahead for Homoeopathy
(2020) Khurana, Anil
Clinical case reports: A time-tested, traditional way to enhance evidence
(2022) Khurana, Anil
Building up the scientific evidence base of Homoeopathy
(2020) Khurana, Anil
Background: Prospective assessment of homoeopathic symptoms is different from eliciting symptoms in daily practice. In prognostic factor research, we apply symptom questionnaires with Likert scales to assess symptoms in different intensities. In former research, we tested a 5-point Likert scale, which rendered a rather high prevalence for some symptoms even the strongest intensity, not useful in daily practice. A longer, 7-point Likert scale might render more useful outcome. Objective: To study if a longer Likert scale perform better in homoeopathic prognostic factor research. Methods: A 7-point Likert scale questionnaire with 30 polar symptoms was tested on 300 patients. Responses to various domains of temperature, climate, diurnal, influence of sleep, eating and desires/aversions were elicited. The outcome was compared with the former 5-point Likert scale. Results: The mean prevalence of all symptoms in the highest intensity with the 7-point Likert scale is (much) lower than in the 5-point scale, and for some symptoms, more useful. For a few symptoms, the prevalence remained high, even in the highest intensity. Conclusion: A longer Likert scale performs better in homoeopathic prognostic factor research, but not for all symptoms. The filling out of this questionnaire by patients should be guided by homoeopathic practitioners who are properly trained in prospective assessment of homoeopathic symptoms.
(2020) Khurana, Anil
Are we at the crossroads for integrative medicine?
(2021) Khurana, Anil
Another pandemic year: What it means for homoeopathy
(2021) Khurana, Anil

About US
Contact Us